Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Beter/Beter28

Internet Message Format | 1996-07-07 | 42KB

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------

   Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is November 21, 1977,
and this is my Audioletter No. 28.

   In the closing moments of Audioletter No. 22 for March 1977, I
warned you that: "The elaborate war plan which I revealed in monthly
Audioletter No. 6 for November 1975 is being revised and updated for
application in the present circumstances. Certain of my sources have
expressed great concern to me recently that a provocation for war in
the Middle East is now being established that will be unlike anything
we have ever seen before." And then I added: "To achieve that purpose,
plans are being seriously considered which, if carried out, could
instantly throw all three major religions of the western world into
turmoil in the course of igniting a Middle East conflict. My hope is
that by warning you of the existence of such plans, I am making them
too dangerous for the conspirators to carry out; but in case they are
carried out, I hope that you will now be able to recognize it
immediately when it happens." (End of quotation from Audioletter No.
22)

   As I speak these words today, eight months later, the eyes of the
world are suddenly focused on the Middle East as never before. The
stalemate of Middle East peace negotiations has, in a week's time,
been shattered in a spectacular way, and something unheard of is
unfolding before our very eyes. After 29 years of hostility and wars,
President Anwar Sadat of Egypt left Jerusalem today where he talked of
peace face to face with Israeli leaders and to address the Israeli
parliament. All other diplomatic efforts to bring peace in that region
have been thrown aside by Sadat's unexpected mission to Israel. But
already Sadat finds himself almost totally isolated in the Arab world,
supported only by Tunisia and Morocco.

   All of this, my friends, is only the beginning. The plan to plunge
the Middle East into war as the first step toward Nuclear War One, has
now been set in motion; and Sadat's trip is intended to be nothing
more than a major step towards fulfillment of this plan.

   It is now almost two months since America's disastrous defeat in
the still secret Battle of the Harvest Moon--history's first Space
Battle, on September 27, 1977. Since that time, our rulers have been
trying for the very first time in their lives to deal with a situation
in which they no longer have a hidden whip with which to make the
Soviet Union cooperate with them. But they are not doing the one thing
which would have at least a chance at preventing nuclear war, and that
is total official world-wide exposure of the present Soviet war threat
as it affects not only the United States but also many other
countries. Instead, they are falling back on the techniques of
maneuver, deception, and doublecross. Now that they have lost control
of the Soviet Union, the Rockefeller brothers are discovering that
their survival is tied to our national survival after all; but instead
of letting us in on what we now face, their controlled CIA and other
agents are trying to find some way to maneuver out of the Russian bear
trap--stalling for time while still keeping us in the dark.

   My three topics for today are: Topic #1--A HOUSE DIVIDED AGAINST
ITSELF OVER SALT; Topic #2--THE EXCHANGE OF SOVIET AND AMERICAN
THREATS; and Topic #3--THE SADAT TRIP TO ISRAEL AND NUCLEAR WAR ONE.

Topic #1--In 1961 two major programs were started in parallel by the
controlled government of the United States. One was America's crash
program to go to the moon, announced by President Kennedy in May of
that year; the other was the program to disarm America in stages,
signaled by the creation of the "Arms Control and Disarmament Agency"
in September of that same year--1961. Neither the moon project nor the
disarmament program was what it seemed on the surface; and while they
were made to seem unrelated, they were actually two arms of a single
military strategy for dictatorship over the United States and finally
over the world. It is this diabolical strategy that has finally jumped
the tracks, leaving not only the United States but also our hidden
rulers in a desperate situation.

   The strategy which began to be implemented in 1961 was a very
complex one, but its underlying concept is as simple as it is
astonishing. Basically our rulers were in effect going underground
with all of the most important new military developments while
gradually stripping us of our existing better-known military
capabilities. In the process, our Constitutional military
services--that is, those which are required by law to serve you and
me--have been gradually downgraded, weakened, and demoralized. But
behind the scenes, unhampered by legal or moral constraints, ever more
advanced weapons have been created for the exclusive benefit of our
secret rulers without any hint of their existence to the public or to
Congress. Thus, as I first revealed ten months ago in Audioletter No.
20, the controlled CIA has secretly become the most powerful military
agency in the United States in total violation of its charter and the
United States Constitution.

   The centerpiece of this 16-year-old program of developing totally
secret weapons, was our Moon Program. In Audioletter No. 26 two months
ago I told you the full story about our Moon project, which from the
start had a military purpose and which ended in disaster just two
months ago on September 27, 1977. But there were many other aspects to
this program as well. For example, in recent years the American public
have become accustomed to publicly-acknowledged weapons programs
costing vast sums that seem out of all proportion to what the weapons
are worth. These cost overruns, my friends, are due not only to
mismanagement and waste; they are also a means of financing secret
projects by burying their costs in the bloated budgets of
publicly-known programs. As for the weapons themselves that we are
publicly told about today, it's almost as if innovation and progress
had suddenly stopped in 1961 aside from marginal improvements here and
there. When we hear about nuclear ballistic missile submarines, for
example, how many people stop to think how long it has been since they
made their appearance? The first atomic submarine, the USS NAUTILUS,
was launched nearly a quarter century ago, in 1954, and was a
spectacular advance over the diesel and battery-powered boats of World
War II. Only 5 years later, but now nearly 20 years ago, came the next
spectacular advance--the ballistic missile submarine, beginning with
the GEORGE WASHINGTON in 1959. At about the same time, the public was
given a hint of 'things to come' whenfilms were made public showing
the periscope of a research submarine outrunning a speeding Coast
Guard Cutter with ease. But starting in 1961, publi c attention to the
possibilities of major future advances began to be avoided. In the
same way, the 16 years from 1945 to 1961, saw a spectacular steady
advancement in military aircraft capabilities. In 1945 our first-line
fighters and bombers were propeller-driven, jets were still largely
experimental, and most people took it for granted that there was a
sound barrier that could not be cracked; but a mere 10 years later,
jet bombers and fighters ruled the air and supersonic travel was a
reality. In 1956, the F-104 was introduced with a top speed of 2-1/2
times the speed of sound, roughly the same as the newest American
fighters today. We hear all about the wonderful Cruise Missile, but we
are not supposed to remember another kind of cruise missile of a
decade ago, canceled by then Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara.
Called PLUTO, it was to be nuclear-powered, able to circle the earth
several times over, and strike an enemy from any direction at
extremely low altitudes and supersonic speeds. And while we content
ourselves with fatiguing 20-year-old slow B-52s, we're not supposed to
remember that in the early 60's the B-70 was already flying at three
times the speed of sound.

   By now most Americans have all but forgotten about these
fast-moving developments of yesteryear. Many of these lie far beyond
any technology which is publicly admitted to be in use today, and they
provide a dim hint of the secret weapons developments that have
actually taken place without our consent--and not for our good. Only
the most spectacular, huge program of them all, the Moon Program, was
made public simply because there was no other way to do it. As I
explained in Audioletter No. 26, secrecy was maintained by not letting
us in on the purpose of the Moon Program, bathing the program
otherwise in great publicity. Originally the plan was for the United
States to be decimated in Nuclear War One as part of a larger plot for
world control; but now, the secret American Moon Base in Copernicus
Crater has been put out of action--the Russians are now on the moon,
furiously at work. The Soviet Union is the exclusive possessor of the
awesome new Particle Beam Weapon, which is being used to blow our Spy
Satellites out of the sky; and all but two of the secret CIA undersea
super-missiles which were planted by Glomar Explorer and other means,
have sprung leaks and become useless. For the very first time the
Soviet Union is in the driver's seat militarily, and America's secret
rulers are in disarray over what to do.

   Last month I exposed the events leading to the Carter
administration's surrender to the Soviet Union on October 14, 1977, in
the face of a deadly Soviet submarine threat against our country. The
terms of the surrender require quick acceptance by us of a SALT II
agreement which will begin the final, total disarming of America; but
once we are disarmed, the intention of the Kremlin's leaders is to
ultimately strike the United States in a devastating military blow
anyway. The more fully we can be disarmed beforehand, the less
suffering will have to be endured by Russia as the price of destroying
America for all time.

   To grasp the Soviet thinking about all of this, one must begin by
understanding one key but little known fact--the Kremlin is no longer
ruled today by the Bolshevik Communists whose November 1917 Revolution
was celebrated this month. The Soviet inner circle today are
Communists but of a very different breed from Lenin and his
Bolsheviks. They were atheistic Communists, whereas the ruling group
today would be better described as self-styled Spiritual Communists;
and while the Bolsheviks drew upon international support and were
dominated by international interests, the Kremlin rulers of today are
strongly nationalistic. They are determined that Soviet Russia, not
just international Communism for its own sake, shall rule the world.

   When Alexander Solzhenitsyn left the Soviet Union in exile, he
first had to sign a document in which he indicated that he still
believed in Communism, meaning Spiritual Communism, in which the
Communist government would be under the control of the church. When he
sent this letter to the Kremlin, it was accepted and he was allowed to
go. Solzhenitsyn today champions the reformation of the Soviet-Marxist
government, but this reformation is not intended to break down the
present Soviet power structure. Indeed, Solzhenitsyn has said while
predicting the imminent fall of the West, that he expects to be back
in Russia within just a few years' time.

   The take-over of the new ruling faction from the Bolsheviks began
with the death of Joseph Stalin on March 5, 1953. This faction of
Marxists, working within Russia had allied themselves with the
Bolsheviks in 1917, thereby guaranteeing the success of the Bolshevik
Revolution. But even though the Bolsheviks and the self-styled
Spiritual Communists agreed on the concept of Communism as the proper
form of government, the Spiritual Communists retained their separate
identity and worked toward the day when they would be able to seize
total control for themselves. That day arrived when Stalin died--March
5, 1953. The following day Georgi Malenkov, the brother-in-law of
Nikita Khrushchev, became Soviet Premier. When he was succeeded two
years later on February 8, 1955, by Nikolai Bulganin, the transition
was peaceful, without bloodshed. A year later, Khrushchev as First
Secretary of the Communist Party, launched his famous campaign to
de-Stalinize Russia. Khrushchev himself had been an accessory to
brutal purges on behalf of the Stalinist state, but when he replaced
Bulganin as Premier on March 27, 1958, the transition once again was
peaceful. Bulganin had resigned. On October 15, 1964, Leonid Brezhnev
replaced Khrushchev as First Secretary of the Communist Party, and
Aleksei Kosygin became Premier. Khrushchev was in deep trouble because
of his failure in the Cuban Missile Crisis and some other sharp
reversals of his policies. But even Khrushchev was not liquidated in
the old Bolshevik tradition of bloody power struggles. Instead, he was
simply pushed aside and allowed to live in quiet retirement, writing
his memoirs and receiving his pension. Power struggles in the Kremlin
for the past quarter century have been devoid of the bloody infighting
that was typical of the Bolsheviks. The new breed in the Kremlin today
can be as brutal as anyone with their enemies or with those who rise
up against their rule, as proven in Hungary in 1956 and in
Czechoslovakia in 1968; but among themselves there is a degree of
tight-knit mutual respect that would have been inconceivable in the
old Bolshevik days. They are united in their religion of Spiritual
Communism, and in their hatred for the international forces with whom
they have been forced to cooperate for so long.

   My friends, the international forces which are controlled today by
the four Rockefeller brothers is motivated primarily by greed and lust
for power, but the self-styled Spiritual Communists who control the
Kremlin today look upon their goal of Communizing the world from an
added perspective. While they strive for power and total control, they
are motivated by the zeal of saving their own souls. Like the
Christian Crusaders of centuries ago, who sought to evangelize the
world at the point of a sword, the Kremlin of today intends to impose
its system on all of us with the dedication, steadfastness, and
determination of the true believer. In their view, any amount of
suffering and brutality is justified so long as it leads toward the
final goal of World Spiritual Communism under Soviet domination. This
change in the make-up of the Kremlin has never been fully understood
or appreciated by those who dominate our government behind the scenes.
And confronted as they are by the unified determined stance of the
Kremlin, they are responding with indecision, divisions within their
own ranks, and desperate maneuverings. The real divisions that now
exist within the ruling circles of thiscountry are being compounded
by some of these maneuvers which are intended to stall for time
without arousin g Soviet suspicions. As a result, as the United States
faces the worst threat in its history, we see in our own country a
house divided against itself, some saying SALT II is wonderful, others
saying it is dangerous, still others daring to tell the public a few
words about the agreement that will seal our fate, yet others
declaring in total ignorance that SALT II is a good thing and that its
critics should be investigated. Some of the controversy is real, some
manipulated, but most of the spokesmen on the political scene,
regardless of their SALT viewpoint, are tied to the one Rockefeller
international party that rules not only North America but Europe and
Japan as well--the TRILATERAL COMMISSION, headed by one David
Rockefeller.

   Last month I described the growing euphoria over the certainty of a
SALT II agreement, but even as I recorded that tape, the multi-prong
controversy over SALT II was increasing. On November 1st, news reports
suddenly said snags had cropped up in the SALT II talks. A former arms
control negotiator was quoted as saying, "I believe we are locked into
inferiority and I don't know how to get out of it." The next day,
November 2, Leonid Brezhnev proposed in a speech that all nuclear
explosions be banned, including peaceful and underwater explosions.
His mention of underwater explosions was actually a veiled threat,
urging the Carter administration to 'get on with it' in selling the
SALT II surrender to Congress and the American public. Secretary of
State Cyrus Vance immediately hailed Brezhnev's statement as a great
thing, adding: "There has been improvement in the relationship between
ourselves and the Soviet Union in the last several weeks." Two days
later on November 4, Vance was totally unprepared to back up his
answers about SALT details in a closed-door Senate hearing. The reason
is that the administration is preparing to go around Congress to
conclude a SALT II agreement with Moscow by EXECUTIVE ORDER. The SALT
II contract will actually contain United States capitulation terms;
meanwhile Congress is being used as much as possible to raise a smoke
screen of controversy to provide an excuse to buy time. Three days
later, on November 7, a fresh campaign began to reassure the Kremlin
that the agreement of October 14 to accept the disarming of America by
SALT II is still on track. Political attacks were unleashed against
SALT critics for allegedly leaking information to the public that
might jeopardize SALT II. Meanwhile the 60th anniversary of the
Bolshevik Revolution was being celebrated in Moscow with the biggest
military parade through Red Square ever. And while Soviet President
Brezhnev talked detente, his Defense Minister delivered a speech so
belligerent that it left many western observers shaken and bewildered.

   To continue soothing the Russian Bear, Jimmy Carter said on
November 11, "My prediction is we will have a SALT agreement. There
will be a SALT II. We will immediately continue with a SALT III." In
this he was parroting the Kremlin line, echoing Soviet Ambassador
Dobrynin who predicted that same day that there will be a SALT
agreement before the end of the year. But the divided house of
America's government continued to careen along, out of control. Only
two days after these reassuring public words to the Kremlin by Carter,
officials of his own administration said that it would probably be
another three to six months before SALT II became a reality. The same
day, Senate Minority Leader Howard Baker told the press that SALT II
"is in trouble now."

   Soviet exasperation has been building rapidly at the on-again,
off-again political game-playing over SALT II. Only last month the
Soviet Union backed off from a nuclear strike against the United
States in response to a capitulation by the Carter administration on
October 14. The Russians can recognize stalling when they see it, and
they wasted no time in flexing their own military muscle this month to
make the Carter administration knuckle under again.

Topic #2--In Audioletter No. 24 for May 1977, six months ago, I
revealed the beginning of a Soviet program of preparing for
geophysical warfare with huge nuclear bombs planted at strategic
locations under the sea to produce artificial earthquakes and tidal
waves. In Audioletter No. 25 for August I also gave the coordinates of
10 new bombs, cobalt bombs, that had been planted in addition to the 7
super-bombs lurking around the Philippine Islands. Since that time,
dozens of additional undersea bombs have been planted worldwide and
several have been set off.

   The strength of the quake that is triggered by setting off such a
bomb can vary somewhat, depending on the stresses that already exist
in the earth's crust at that location and other factors. But in many
cases the shock strength turns out to be about 6.5 on the Richter
Scale, strong enough to do major damage if it were on land. As a
result, there have been a considerable number of undersea quakes of
strength around 6.5 reported lately, yet the news media never comment
on how strange it is that so many quakes are happening with virtually
the same strength. The most remarkable case of media silence about the
similar strength of so many quakes, took place on September 4, 1977,
2-1/2 months ago. On that day the Soviet Union set off four of their
undersea bombs in the Pacific--one at the north end of the New
Hebrides trench northeast of Australia, and three in the Aleutian
trench thousands of miles to the north. The three main quakes that
were produced in the Aleutians had Richter Scale readings of 6.5, 6.6,
and 6.5 respectively. The one in the New Hebrides was slightly
stronger with a reading of 6.8. These facts were reported in the news,
but no one ventured a word about the similar strength of all these
major quakes.

   On November 2 Leonid Brezhnev mentioned in a speech his hope that
all nuclear explosions, including underwater explosions, could be
terminated. But the political stalling tactics against SALT II were
just getting underway, and two days later the Kremlin set off another
undersea bomb in the Aleutians to remind the Carter administration of
what they can do. The result was an undersea quake near the Island of
Adak and, as usual, the reported strength of the shock was 6.5 on the
Richter Scale. Two days later, impatient with Carter administration
performance in pushing through acceptance of the SALT II proposals to
disarm America, the Kremlin raised the stakes.

   Shortly after midnight Sunday November 6, 1977, Jimmy Carter's home
state of Georgia became the target for another demonstration of what
the Kremlin plans for those who stand in their way. A button was
pushed, and a small nuclear mine that had been planted just upstream
of the Toccoa Falls Dam in northern Georgia was detonated. Torrential
rains in the area were just ending, but as usual the dam showed no
sign that anything was wrong. A year earlier the same dam had
experienced such heavy rainfall that water spilled over the top. This
had caused the creek in the valley 200 feet below to overflow its
banks, but the dam itself had suffered no damage. For forty years the
Toccoa Dam had served its purpose without incident, and a visual
inspection just three days earlier had revealed nothing wrong; but
when the Soviet mine was set off, the dam collapsed instantly. The
blast from the mine momentarily parted the waters of Kelly Barnes
Lake, throwing a wave of water downstream with the dam and momentarily
backing up the water upstream of the mine. Then the bulk of the lake
rushed out through the huge breach in the dam, hurtled over
200-foot-high Toccoa Falls, and rushed into the valley  below. A double
wave of water swept through the Bible College campus below--a smaller
initial wave, followed by the main body of water. A three-mile long
swath was devastated and 38 people died, half of them children.

   The Toccoa Dam disaster came in the wake of deepening worry over
the continued Soviet Particle Beam attacks on our spy satellites.
Within hours Jimmy Carter postponed his planned trip abroad telling us
that the reason was to push Congress t oward adoption of his so-called
Energy Bill. Three days after the Toccoa disaster on November 9, U.S.
Ambassador Malcolm Toon met at his request with Soviet President
Brezhnev in the Kremlin for over an hour, delivering an urgent letter
from Carter. No details were released about the letter, but Carter was
making two basic requests: (1) That the Soviet Union cease and desist
from destroying American surveillance satellites, and (2) that
Brezhnev and Carter meet at the earliest possible moment. But Brezhnev
gave Carter no encouragement about a meeting until after a SALT II
accord is reached, and he drummed away at the urgency of finalizing
the agreement dictated by the Kremlin. In other words, the Soviets do
not intend to tolerate stalling by the Carter administration. The same
day, November 9, 1977, events were set in motion that are intended to
unleash a Middle East War--and in its wake NUCLEAR WAR ONE. I'll tell
you more about that in Topic #3.

   On November 12, Soviet pressure on the Carter administration was
raised a notch higher. In Iri, South Korea, a railroad yard was
suddenly laid waste by a tremendous explosion. Scores were killed
outright, over a thousand people were injured, nearly 10,000 homes and
buildings were destroyed, and over 14,000 people were suddenly
homeless. That blast was heard over 10 miles away. Soviet agents had
planned for a railroad car full of dynamite to be in the blast area to
provide a cover story for public consumption. But South Korean
analysts who arrived on the scene knew right away that this was no
ordinary dynamite blast. An explosive sitting on the surface, like the
carload of dynamite, produces an extremely wide, shallow crater; but
in the Iri disaster not one but two distinct craters were produced
with an area of overlap between them. Furthermore, each crater was
extremely deep compared to its width--one of them 49 feet deep, the
other 65 feet deep; and although 30 tons of dynamite produces a very
violent blast indeed, each crater corresponds to an explosive force
perhaps 100 times that powerful. According to high intelligence
sources, Soviet agents are known to have buried two (2) clean nuclear
mines in the area where the blast occurred. They were placed side by
side about 100 feet apart--to do maximum damage to the network of
railroad tracks. Each had a yield of several kilotons, a fraction of
the yield of the Hiroshima bomb; and on November 12, 1977, they were
detonated simultaneously. It was a disaster for South Korea--and
another shocking warning to the Carter administration that the Soviet
Union is not to be trifled with. And when Brezhnev speaks of the
urgency of finalizing the SALT II agreement, he means we are on a
short fuse and that he will not be patient for very long. The Carter
administration is being backed into a corner so rapidly by the Kremlin
that an abortive decision was made earlier this month to pull out all
the stops for a pre-emptive war against the Soviet Union. This idea
was to let the chips fall where they may while we do still have some
military might left; but as of two days ago, November 19, the Soviet
Union has already squelched this plan, and the war now brewing is back
on track to be, as Gromyko said to Carter on September 27, 1977, 'on
Soviet terms.'

   The letter from Carter delivered to Brezhnev on November 9 received
no immediate reply. Instead, the blast in South Korea signaled that
the Kremlin was growing still more impatient for the SALT II approval
process to get off dead center, and more of our satellites have been
blasted this month by Soviet Cosmos Interceptors wielding Particle
Beams. By November 18, three days ago, there still had been no direct
answer, and on that day the "Voice of America" was used to hurl a
thinly-veiled threat at Moscow. Every nation uses its national radio
as a tool of propaganda and electronic diplomacy, the United States
included. Every message that is broadcast by the Voice of America is
heavily censored, edited, analyzed and picked apart to make sure that
every word says what the United States government wants said. Bearing
in mind that our satellite warning systems are now being destroyed by
Soviet Killer Satellites, listen carefully to these words from the
Voice of America broadcast of November 18, 1977, and I quote: "The
White House has warned that the deployment of these so-called Killer
Satellites could increase the chances of a first strike in space", and
"the obviously destabilizing danger of satellite warfare is that with
its observation satellites put out of commission, a nation would lose
a major portion of its warning system and might then consider
pre-emptive war." In diplomatic language, these words amounted to a
very clear threat by the United States to attack the Soviet Union if
no satisfaction is received concerning our vanishing spy satellites.
On the afternoon of that same day, November 18, Soviet Ambassador
Anatoly Dobrynin delivered a message from Brezhnev to Carter at the
White House. The message made it clear that Washington is in no
position to dictate anything to the Kremlin now, that the SALT
approval process in the United States is becoming ever more "urgent",
and that the Soviet president would regret being forced to take any
measures that might run counter to the recent 'improvement' in
relations between the two nations.

   The full impact of Brezhnev's last comment reached the White House
at roughly that same time as the Brezhnev message itself. The NATO
underwater sonar nets around Iceland had picked up the Soviet Atlantic
submarine fleet which, as happened six weeks ago, was headed en masse
into the Atlantic at great speed. At the same time, the huge Soviet
Pacific submarine fleet was also on its way toward the United States,
and the Gulf fleet was already moving into position to threaten us
from the south. Even before the Voice of America broadcast, the
Kremlin knew that the Carter administration response to increasing
Soviet pressure over SALT could possibly be some kind of bluff and
possibly panic as well, so the Soviet navy had been dispatched in
order to ensure that nothing would get out of hand; and when
government officials here learned that the Soviet fleet was on its way
here again, they promptly wilted. Shades of Kerensky! As of now they
are once again concentrating on doing as they are told by the Soviet
Union, and both the Pacific and Atlantic fleets have headed back
toward port; but the Soviet Gulf Fleet has not left--it is staying on
station for the moment ready for attack at a moment's notice from our
soft underbelly to the south. This is Moscow's way of discouraging the
Carter administration from attempting any more bluffs or hasty actions
that might upset America's programmed march into final disaster.

Topic #3--Audioletter No. 22, in which I warned about a horrendous new
plan to provoke a Middle East war, was recorded on March 27, 1977.
Exactly one week later, on April 3, 1977, President Anwar Sadat of
Egypt arrived in Washington for talks with President Carter, and the
first phase of the CIA Middle East plot got under way. Sadat had in
the past been asked from time to time by reporters whether
face-to-face negotiations directly between the Arabs and Israelis
might be useful. He had always rejected this out of hand, and when
asked the same question on April 6 responded in the same way. He said
that after 29 years of hatred and 4 wars, the Arabs were not yet ready
for such a drastic step. But during his visit here, Sadat was
subjected to the psychological programming techniques which I revealed
over two years ago in Audioletter No. 5 for October 1975. These
techniques can be used to alter a person's brain-wave pattern and
inject thoughts and tendencies that differ from their normal thinking.
As I told you then, a world leader can be programmed to change his
policies--and that is what happened to Sadat. During his visit here
last April, a single thought was planted in Sadat's mind--namely, to
go directly to Israel to negotiate. It was a thought totally foreign
to Sadat, but ever since his visit here it has been in his mind
constant ly, and he has been unable to shake it.

   While Sadat was here on April 7, Prime Minister Rabin of Israel
resigned. Supposedly he was ensnared in a financial scandal, but
actually he had learned of the plot to bring on a war and he wanted no
part of it. Rabin's departure from the scene slowed down this plan
while a new Prime Minister was elected. It was Menachem Begin. He had
to form a government and establish himself on the world stage. But
now, the fuse had been lit that is intended to make the Middle East
explode into war.

   On November 9, reacting to the stimulus implanted in his mind,
Sadat startled everyone by saying he would be willing to go anywhere,
even Jerusalem, to seek peace. Only five days later, television
interviews of Sadat and Begin by Walter Cronkite of CBS and others set
the stage for Sadat's trip to Israel. Sadat's decision to go to Israel
was so abrupt that it produced a sharp contrast between Sadat's
actions and those of his own Foreign Minister Fahmy. While Sadat was
on television with Walter Cronkite, Fahmy was in Tunisia at a meeting
of Arab Foreign Ministers trying to rally all the Arabs to a united
front in peace negotiations with Israel. Three days later, Sadat
announced his acceptance of the invitation he had solicited from
Israel, and Fahmy resigned. For Sadat, the earliest possible moment
for the trip was hardly soon enough because he was now under a
psychological compulsion to make the trip. Begin invited Sadat to
Israel on or after November 21, but Sadat answered that he would
arrive on the 19th, which he did. Now, in spite of the best of
intentions, Sadat has been used as a tool of the CIA to narrow the
focus of Middle East peace negotiations to the outcome of the
Sadat-Begin discussions.

   It is now a much easier matter than before to torpedo peace in the
Middle East--and that is what is planned. The Sadat peace initiative
to Israel is supposed to be, unknown to Sadat himself, the first step
toward war. Meanwhile the framework for a war to accomplish the
objectives described two years ago in my Audioletter No. 6, is being
established all around us. The American team in the Sinai, put there
supposedly to act as a buffer between Israel and Egypt, is still
there, having quietly swollen to a force more than a thousand strong
armed with F-15's and nuclear weapons. Cautious Saudi Arabia has been
drawn into making statements recently in support of the Arab cause
that will serve as a sufficient excuse for Saudi Arabia to be included
in the nuclear strike against Arab OPEC oil wells that is planned when
war comes. Meanwhile we have been seeing the cover stories in the news
about possible acquisition by Israel of large amounts of nuclear
materials from America in recent years, planting the idea that Israel
has "the bomb."

   The triggering of the Sadat trip to Israel and the extremely rapid
pace of events must be considered in light of the equally sudden visit
to Washington by the Shah of Iran on November 14. This was the same
day that Sadat and Begin committed themselves to a face-to-face
meeting during interviews on television. On the 16th the Shah left the
United States, and on that day Tehran Radio broadcast that there is
"total United States commitment to come to Iran's aid in the event of
an emergency." Iran is positioned on the soft underbelly of the Soviet
Union and it bristles with advanced American weaponry. Two days later
the Voice of America broadcast its war threat against Moscow which I
quoted earlier. But the chess players in the Kremlin had already
gotten the message and the Soviet fleet was already at sea by then. As
a result, any active threat Russia may be facing from Iran on its
southern flank is offset by an active threat on our own southern flank
in the form of submarines on station in the Gulf of Mexico. Thus,
while the remnants of the United States government are maneuvering to
try to salvage some benefit for themselves from the coming war, the
Kremlin is matching every move with counteractive measures designed to
maintain their commanding military position, and every day that is
wasted by not revealing the truth of these events, works to the
benefit of the Soviet Union in that the Soviet Union is consolidating
its newly dominant position still further.

   When I recorded Audioletter No. 27 last month, Soviet cosmonauts
had established an initial base of operations in Jules Verne Crater on
the back side of the moon. However, it was expected at that time that
after preliminary preparations they would very shortly be moving both
equipment and personnel to the near side, setting up an operational
Particle Beam weapon almost immediately when they did so. On October
30, the day after I recorded my tape, I was informed that an initial
move to the front side had taken place to Gibbs Crater, which is on
the southeast rim of the near side of the moon. Since that time,
Soviet activity on the moon has been steadily increasing. As of now
there are seven (7) Soviet Particle Beam weapons dotted around the
near side of the moon and, surprisingly, there are three separate
back-up bases on the far side, including the original site at Jules
Verne Crater. As yet, all of these installations are very thinly
manned and they are far from being self-sufficient at this point--in
order to keep functioning they must periodically receive supplies from
earth. But the Particle Beam weapons are operational, and if the
normal Soviet pattern is followed, we can expect a test of a
moon-based Particle Beam weapon against some earth target in the very
near future--and if this is done, it will probably take place under
circumstances where its effects can be explained away as having some
other cause. Possibly for the sake of secrecy, a target area within
the Soviet Union far from populated areas, will be chosen for such
testing; but it's also possible that like the first operational test
of an orbital Particle Beam weapon, the first test of a Lunar Particle
Beam weapon might be against some target that the Soviet Union wishes
to destroy.

   In any case, here are the lunar navigational coordinates of the
seven Particle Beam weapons currently on the near side of the moon:
No. 1 east of the Sea of Cold at 55 degrees 54 minutes north, 51
degrees zero minutes east; No. 2 west of the Sea of Crises at 16 - 33
North, 48 - 51 east; No. 3 southeast of the Sea of Fertility at 31 -
53 south, 73 - 9 east; No. 4 near the south pole on the southwest side
at 72 - 26 south, 67 - 30 west; No. 5 near Phocylides Crater in the
southwest quadrant at 50 - 53 south, 57 - 49 west; No. 6 southwest of
the Ocean of Storms at 9 - 26 south, 66 - 52 west; and No. 7 northeast
of the Apollo 14 landing site near the center of the near side of the
moon at 1 - 23 south, 12 - 27 west. The back-up locations on the far
side of the moon are at: No. 1, Jules Verne Crater roughly 36 degrees
south, 147 degrees east; No. 2 southeast of Pasture Crater at 13 - 36
south, 108 - 26 east; No. 3 southwest of Compton Crater at 51 - 3
north, 95 - 0 east.

   The Soviet intentions toward us when Nuclear War One finally erupts
are becoming all too clear because as of November 10, 1977, I am
informed that Soviet agents are still at work throughout the United
States mining additional targets for eventual destruction by remote
control. One target area to which I believe I should call specific
attention is the Kensico Reservoir just north of White Plains, New
York. On September 21, 1977, two months ago, I was called by the FBI
to ask for any information I could give them about the situation
there. They had been tipped off that the Kensico Reservoir might be in
danger in some way and wanted to know what I could tell them. I told
them what I am telling you now, that there is a Soviet nuclear mine on
the upstream side of the dam toward the east end. I also gave the FBI
the locations of other Soviet nuclear devices in the area--such as one
each in the south end of Pocantico Lake, another in the east end of
Tarrytown Reservoir, and one in the Hudson River near the east end of
the Tappan Zee Bridge. Whatever the FBI may have intended to do with
this information, nothing has been done--the bombs are still there. It
may well be that they were simply overtaken by events and their hands
tied before they could do anything, because it was only six days
later--September 27, 1977--that America lost the Battle of the Harvest
Moon and Andrei Gromyko delivered an ultimatum to Jimmy Carter for
America to start towing the Soviet line. But whatever the reason, the
FBI's concern over the Kensico Reservoir leads me to believe I should
call special attention to it.

   Should the Kensico Reservoir be ruptured, the first victims will be
the Holy Name School, situated like the Toccoa Bible College in the
shadow of the dam. But beyond that, flood waters from Kensico
Reservoir would rampage through White Plains and on southward perhaps
all the way to the North Bronx, New York City. The devastation and
loss of life would almost certainly dwarf anything like had ever been
seen in America, yet no one is doing anything about it. A major
insurance company learned recently from British intelligence about the
situation at Kensico Reservoir and went to the New York City police
about it--to no avail. Therefore apparently all I can do is to warn
you.

   My friends, what I have said in Audioletter No. 24 for May 1977, I
repeat again now. Behind the scenes maneuvering and trickery can lead
only to disaster for America. Only TOTAL EXPOSURE of what is happening
has any hope at all of turning the tide against utter catastrophe. I
have pledged to continue doing what I can toward this end, and I ask
you to join with me in this very important effort.

   Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and
may God bless and protect each and every one of you.
------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.

 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])